America si UK ultimele tari sa-ti cresti copilul

America si UK ultimele tari sa-ti cresti copilul | Autor: Andrada

Link direct la acest mesaj

Raspunsuri

Inceputul discutiei

Link direct catre acest raspuns valentinag spune:

Din cate am inteles eu,cica este contestat raportul,desi este facut de unicef,pentru ca nu au fost actualizate datele,cum ca ar fi din 2000-2001!


"La vita e bella"
poze
marea inghetata

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Andrada spune:

US, UK 'worst places for children'





Britain and the United States are the worst places in the industrialised world for children to live, according to a report by the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef).

They ranked among the bottom third in the study which looked at overall well-being, health and safety, education, relationships, risk and their own sense of well-being.




The study said that child poverty - defined as the percentage of children living in homes with incomes below 50 per cent of the national median - remains above the 15 per cent mark in Britain, the US and Ireland, as well as Spain, Portugal and Italy.






"The evidence from many countries persistently shows that children who grow up in poverty are more vulnerable," the report said, especially in terms of academic underachievement, chances of unemployment and low self-esteem.

Child well-being was rated highest in northern Europe, with the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark leading the list.

"All countries have weaknesses that need to be addressed and no country features in the top third of the rankings for all six dimensions," David Bull, the UK executive director of Unicef, said.

Risk behaviours

Britain lived up to its reputation for "binge-drinking," hazardous sexual activity and drug use, with the report putting the country at the bottom of the rankings for risk behaviours "by a considerable distance".

Almost a third of British youngsters aged 11, 13 and 15 reported being drunk on two or more occasions, against just an average of under 15 per cent in the majority of countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

Britain had made progress in the field of child safety, having cut the incidence of deaths from accidents and injuries to the "remarkably low level" of fewer than 10 per 10,000.

Sweden, the Netherlands and Italy also achieved the same rate of progress.

Relationships

Britain and the US were also found to have the worst rankings in terms of children's relationships with their families and peers.

Unicef noted the sensitivity of this field, but said "at the statistical level, there is evidence to associate growing up in single-parent families and stepfamilies with greater risk to well-being," including dropping out of school, leaving home early, poorer health and low pay.

The US, Britain and Sweden had the highest proportion of children living in single-parent families, while Italy, Greece and Spain had the lowest.

The study, which looked at 40 indicators to gauge quality of life in economically advanced nations, is the first of its kind.

The report said no direct link had been found between gross domestic product and children's well-being.

It highlighted how the Czech Republic had a higher ranking than many richer countries, including France, Austria, the United States and Britain.


Cineva are nevoie de traducere? O sa fac un rezumat daca e nevoie. Scuze pentru text in engleza,
A

www.desprecopii.com/chatnew/Desprecopiichat/PaginapersonalaView.asp?nickname=Andrada" target="_blank">Camera lui Marcu

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Ira spune:

Paradoxul e ca in ciuda conditiilor "neprielnice" USA este singura tara industrializata care isi augmenteaza numarul populatiei prin natalitatea deosebit de crescuta, si nu datorita imigratiei.

Unele criterii de selectare ale UNICEF mi s-au parut infantile rau. Pai daca vin de la UNICEF !

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns ymcar spune:

quote:
Originally posted by Ira

Paradoxul e ca in ciuda conditiilor "neprielnice" USA este singura tara industrializata care isi augmenteaza numarul populatiei prin natalitatea deosebit de crescuta, si nu datorita imigratiei.

Unele criterii de selectare ale UNICEF mi s-au parut infantile rau. Pai daca vin de la UNICEF !



ciudat criteriu... dupa aceeasi logica tiganii din romania au conditii incomparabil mai bune decat romanii. ca au o natalitateeeeee.
nu cumva o fi mai degraba natalitatea asta legata de nivelul de inteligenta, cultura si educatie?

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns belle_vue spune:

Off-topic: ymcar, ma bucura schimbarea aparuta in semnatura ta! Numai bine in continuare!



Mami de Theodor (27.10.2004) si Bebe din burtica (DPN 5 feb 2007)



Those who can't laugh at themselves leave the job to others

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Siminaf spune:

Aha, deci faptul ca adolescentii si copiii maninca micul dejun este considerat negativ. O noua descoperire: nu mincati micul dejun, ca deveniti overweight!

"Meanwhile, Britain was last in family and peer relationships ranking, which measured such things as the rate of single-parent families and whether families ate the main meal of the day together more than once a week. It was also last in behaviors and risks, which considered factors such as the percentage of children who ate breakfast, were overweight, used drugs or alcohol or were sexually active."

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Andrada spune:

Simina problema e ca maninca siguri micul dejun nu ca-l maninca, care e considerat un indicativ al relatiilor in familie. Si oricum nu obezitatea ne-a tras in jos ci saracia copiilor si lipsa grijei medicale daca te uiti mai bine. Dar acu iar o sa vii sa scrii ca ai tai sint OK, ergo America e OK.
Si fireste ca faptul ca si adolescentii britanici fumeaza si au sex nu compenseaza faptul ca americanii au cel mai mare procent si cei mai multi copii sub limita saraciei dupa Mexico,
A


www.desprecopii.com/chatnew/Desprecopiichat/PaginapersonalaView.asp?nickname=Andrada" target="_blank">Camera lui Marcu

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Ira spune:

Ymcar, te consideri superior tiganilor, asta n-ar fi chiar asa de amuzant dac-ai avea si ceva argumente solide in afirmatia ta, sau macar o atitudine mai diplomata.

Toate criteriile-s subiective,
mie ala cu rata de divort mi s-a parut cel mai hilar,
adica spaniolii si portughezii se bat, se omoara, da' ei raman impreuna fratie, ceeace-i super fain pentru educatia copilului,
in schimb americanii divorteaza conformandu-se unor principii precum self respect, nivel material mai ridicat permitand o alta viziune asupra autonomiei si independentei fiecarui parinte, dar in acelasi timp copilu'i traumatizat. Haida de !

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Andrada spune:

quote:
Originally posted by Ira


in schimb americanii divorteaza conformandu-se unor principii precum self respect, nivel material mai ridicat permitand o alta viziune asupra autonomiei si independentei fiecarui parinte, dar in acelasi timp copilu'i traumatizat. Haida de !



Ira sigur ca in general un copil cu parintii divortati are mai multe de intimpinat in viata decit cei cu parintii impreuna.
N-am insa nici o statistica care sa ma faca sa cred ca procentul celor cu probleme similare e acelasi in Spania si America, ca sa scot concluzia ca Americanii au mai mult self esteem. Iar pentru mine chestia cu self-esteemul e complet over-rated. Self esteemul te ajuta sa zimbesti in public dupa ce tocmai aia vut un accident de masina, ai divortat si ti-ai pierdut slujba. Dar nu rezolva fisiia Gaza,
A

www.desprecopii.com/chatnew/Desprecopiichat/PaginapersonalaView.asp?nickname=Andrada" target="_blank">Camera lui Marcu

Mergi la inceput

Link direct catre acest raspuns Siminaf spune:

Andrada, eu nu ma dau exemplu pe mine si ai mei. Wrong. Eu as face doar comparatii cam in genul celor facut de Ira. Iar daca as da exemple, as da din mijlocul comunitatii in care traiesc acum sau din cel al celei in care am trait in trecut. Am cunoscut si eu oameni in afara familiei mele, oricit de greu ar parea de crezut.

Ai inteles gresit ce scrie in articolas (ca numai articol complet si serios nu poate fi numit, are lacune muuulte de prezentare). Era vorba de principala masa a zilei, daca se maninca impreuna cu ceilalti membri ai familiei sau nu. Or principala masa a zilei nu este nicidecum micul dejun, ci dejunul sau cina (in functie de programul de lucru al familiei, evident). Dar asa cum a minca micul dejun este un fapt negativ, probabil ca acum s-a descoperit si ca micul dejun este principala masa a zilei.

Revenind la facut comparatii pentru a comenta articolasul: din pacate nu am timp, ca am de munca. Mai revin cu cititul macar, dar mai tirziu un pic.

Mergi la inceput